Education And Civilization

By Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa, (On Twitter) @c_tamirisa

Flattr this

The principal intellectual contribution of this essay is to overturn the conceptualization of history of Arnold Joseph Toynbee’s “A Study of History” which sees the historical process as the rise and fall of civilizations. This paper argues that the civilizations that Toynbee describes are but sub-categories of the larger civilizational continuum and examines the role of education in the spread of civilization.

Education has been a pillar in the cross fertilization of ideas and the spread of Civilization since the beginning of recorded history, either through migration, travels, trade, the travails of war and conquest, or simply the formal exchange of students, scholars and intellectuals. Note that I have capitalized the word “civilization” to espouse my view that civilization is a continuum in the historical process and used the phrase ‘cross fertilization of ideas’ to explicitly imply, at a minimum the bidirectional, and at a maximum, the n-directional nature of education where the roles of providers and acquirers are neither rigid nor unidirectional. I think such a linguistic exposition of concepts, amply supported by historical evidence, facilitates a bias-free analysis without falling into the trap of “Clash of Civilizations,” where the primary causes of the “clash” are the value judgments associated with civilizations (note the plural), which in my framework are but sub-categories with property variations of the larger Civilization, as it applies to the sociological evolution of homo sapiens sapiens in general, as a biological species.

The practice of democracy in its various adaptations around the world as we see today is but a point in this continuum-a developing and maturing consensus, particularly since the end of World War II and more so, since the end of the Cold War, about the form of political and economic organization that is believed to be adaptable to any given sociological and historical context. Simply put, the principles contained in the frameworks for the practice of modern democracy as invented in 1776 by the United States and rooted in ideas beginning with The Renaissance and through The Enlightenment (which in themselves were a revival of Greek philosophical thought founded by Socrates, Plato and Aristotle), are best suited to Our (capitalized to imply all of humanity) common human nature. This sound philosophical foundation of the Greco-Roman tradition, which has its own basis in the earliest Enlightenment known to humanity around 776 B.C.E, begs the question of convergence at a fundamental level (though full manifestations could be different) among all sociological contexts across the world (I am including religion as a sociological construct). If we ascertain as a matter of scientific inquiry that such a convergence exists, then should not that be an explicit part of education everywhere around the world to bring about democratic societies?

Then as one important element of a long term yet imminent strategy to the confront problem of radical religious fundamentalism in general in various parts of the world, and particularly the recent bouts with the Islamic variety, along the lines of Mbeki vision of “African Renaissance”, an “Islamic Renaissance” seems to be much desired. By “Islamic Renaissance” I mean a vigorous dialog within Islam (particularly as Islam is but an Abrahamic strand) akin to that the West had during The Reformation that not only birthed Protestantism but also sowed the seeds of change in the Roman Catholic Church. Without these two seminal events in western history, perhaps the West today would be no different from orthodox Islamic societies. Events similar to The Reformation can also be found in other religions such as Hinduism, where periods of dogmatic and ritualistic orthodoxy were challenged, resulting in Buddhism, for example, besides a return to moderation in the practice of the tenets of the parent religion. In fact, Christianity itself is a product of such a rebellion within Judaism.

Educational content typically has the tendency to reinforce the prevalent political ideology or orthodoxy as can be seen in Islamic madrassas and the former Soviet Marxist-Leninist educational content. Though it has and is being said that educational content in the West also has similar characteristics in the sense that it tends to promote ‘democratic fundamentalism’, I think such a claim can quickly be invalidated because the content of modern western education is rooted in the process of the Socratic dialog of truth discovery whether it applies to matters of physical scientific empiricism or issues of the polis and the oeikos (this includes the rigorous examination of religious belief and faith itself, without which religious reformation is not possible); therefore, in their very DNA, deviation from truth seeking is not tolerated by democratic societies, and hence they are self-cleansing of fundamentalist impulses-political, economic or social. Simply put, citizens of democracies do not take matters on faith, including matters of faith. The founding documents of the United States are a seminal example of this built-in characteristic of democracies though this behavior of democracies is being currently put to test to check the validity of the capacity of the now powerful western educational establishments to enlighten rather than dominate.

This process of Socratic interaction is built into the content of education in democracies. This is how education in a democracy is attained (I have used the word ‘attained’ because the process of education in democracies implicitly implies that both the teacher and the pupil are educated at the same time). Therefore, a catalyzing elite educated in the scientific method, who believe that it is in their self-interest to develop the institutions of democracy within the sociological context of their countries, whether influencing from abroad or from within their home countries, becomes essential to the formation of successful democracies, as historical evidence amply supports.

In a world where a radical fundamentalist has access to the same communications technology as people in advanced democracies, this leads to, as a matter of policy, the imminent need for investment in pervasive educational technology and infrastructure, including the news media as a mutually educational tool, to support the ‘catalyzing elite’ I mentioned above.

When talking about the modes of the education process, it is also essential to ask the question, for example, is a Taliban better off at Yale University in the United States, or as a matter of public diplomacy, is Yale University better off in Afghanistan, where not one but many ex-Taliban could perhaps obtain a college education (though it still leaves me wondering about their “graduation” from madrassas before getting to Yale!)? American University in Beirut is a case in point.

Education as suggested above, to build new democratic societies as well as to revive existing democracies such as the United States, is necessary to resolve problem of poverty and globalization, because hopelessness and helplessness were and are as much fertile grounds for humaneness as they are for inhumanity.

Advertisements

About Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa

http://www.thecommonera.com/Common_Era/Me.html
This entry was posted in Education, Politics, Sociology, Theology, Transformations LLC and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Education And Civilization

  1. My predicament below has especially be exacerbated since my comments on a working paper titled “Education and Terrorism” by Antonio Spilimbergo of the Research Department of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER):

    I contributed to a Clinton White House requested critical infrastructure protection speech in 2000 at the Greenspan Federal Reserve at the behest of Alan Greenspan through the Federal Reserve’s Staff Director for Management Stephen R. Malphrus and a Deputy Director of the Fed’s Division of Information Technology Marianne Emerson. Because of my contribution, it appears I was set up and put under public observation and surveillance since then.

    I am being forced not to employ myself as a consultant but to be employed by others, to be in the background for putting my skills to use within the existing paradigm of socially acceptable racial and religious attitudes, preferences and biases, politically correctly, and by respecting the de facto social ceilings, whatever the value of my merits and my capacity to realize my fullest potential.

    I am currently a high-value consultant whose work cannot be in the employ of any other corporation because of the potential for abuse of my reputation and presence as an employee within those corporations for corporate benefit through plausible deniability.

    The same argument holds for the government, for example, Ben Bernanke, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and Barack Obama, president of the United States using intelligence agencies to guinea pig me for their self-aggrandizement and of their supporters, a Federal crime, without acknowledging my contributions through direct, explicit hiring in the appropriate position and because I complained about government abuse of power to the media, the Senate, the FBI and the Nobel Committee, while a government employee at the Federal Reserve in 2010.

    This is a suspected worldwide Secret Service/DIA/CIA activity of white/gray/black guinea-pigging by triggering social controls and a gagging environment through government mediation, in violation of Amendments 1 and 4, to prevent my idea and business model from taking hold because the United States government sees it as not being in the national interest, albeit peaceful, except if it is given away to others of high influence and power.

    My unemployment income through 05/2012 is $11,180. I am unemployed because whenever I am seeking to be a consultant, beginning at the Federal Reserve in 2009, I am being forced to resign from W2 employment to force me to remain in the background. The economics of this unemployment income is a wage of about $5.82 per hour, less than the minimum wage in any part of the country, for a work-year equivalent of 1920 to 2080 hours, while subjecting me to government psychological operations (psyops) to “play the game” or “play along” with the guinea pigging so that the government does not have to acknowledge its criminal wrong doing which has destroyed my marriage of more than 18 years and my family.

    After attempting to medically label me paranoid and delusional through the Montgomery Country Circuit Court in Rockville, MD and the United States Secret Service, the Federal Reserve is finally relenting and cooperating, instead of enjoining me to cooperate as it had done when I complained about the institution commandeering my work outside of my job responsibilities to the benefit of its economist staff, political appointees and others in Washington and elsewhere since 2000 without my consent.

    The Federal Reserve is processing my three (3) SF-95 claims for personal injury damages for the period 2000-2010 and the period since, despite me leaving the Fed. The Senate is investigating a veiled death threat that I received from the Fed. The CIA Inspector General is also in receipt of my SF-95 claim because its security guard, Mr. Pistol, lifted a sub-machine gun for no fault of mine when I went there to drop off my business card as a consultant for Agency procurement attention. The Montgomery County Circuit Court in Rockville, MD is willing to take a second look at the unfairness of my divorce court proceedings brought about by chronic Federal Reserve-IMF interference by pressuring my then spouse Dr. Tabatchnaia Tamirisa, a mid-level manager rank economist in the IMF’s Research Department, to control me at home.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s