Law And Politics

By Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa, (On Twitter) @c_tamirisa

Flattr this

“I have said earlier that the United States is now totally frank about putting its cards on the table. That is the case. Its official declared policy is now defined as ‘full spectrum dominance’. That is not my term, it is theirs. ‘Full spectrum dominance’ means control of land, sea, air and space and all attendant resources.”

Harold Pinter
Nobel Lecture, Literature, 2005
Wikipedia, Full Spectrum Operations

The law, in every culture, had come from God to Man. And then it had become the way of life. The modern movement to separate the Church from the State, since the 19th century, which obfuscated freedom of religion and state religion, has separated the conscience from the public square.

The power of technology to live more comfortable lives has brought rationalism to faith, layering logical reasoning over an undercurrent of the theology of the ages until it became buried in the recesses of the mind which, in the humdrum of daily life, has little time to self-reflect on the deep-seated bases and biases of judgment.

This inability to understand, as a matter of habit, why we do what we do but do anyway leads us to lose our freedom of the mind to the technologies of comfort, as if there is a trade-off. Steadily, the technologies of controlling the mind takeover. In democratic societies, people begin to be asked if they obey authority (“do as I say”), the power of one man over another, not the power of God over Man or the power of justice in society (“do as I do”).

The dictum of “do as I say” a.k.a psyops by the Psychological Operations group of the United States Directorate of National Intelligence (DNI), primarily located in the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) of the Department of Defense (DoD), as the principal weapon in the global war on terror, has turned the fine art of persuasion in geopolitics, domestic and foreign, into a technocratic exercise to maintain the control of a few people and their livelihoods over those of a vast many others around the world.

Any perceived threats, including humanitarian, to either or both the economic security and the security of the Anglo-Saxon model of global governance, a.k.a “national security”, are dealt with by burrowing into the minds of the “foreigners”, including inside US borders, citizenship laws, let alone the Bill of Rights, notwithstanding, using the full spectrum of the Genesis (And God Said, “Let There Be Light”) to establish citizen intent against state intent, the “state” being the abstraction of interest groups loyal to an ideology of power and benefiting from the post-Cold War security (economic and military, domestic and foreign) industrial complex (SIC) which has become a far more lucrative enterprise than the military industrial complex (MIC) of the Cold War.

This corrupt state-mediated social control becomes the norm in the name of geopolitical stability, denying the peoples of the world their flowering to their fullest potential – the true source of social stability. The Constitution of the United States, reflecting the intents and the purposes of the American Declaration of Independence and the expected culture of the society, becomes a fig leaf to hide the nakedness of the intents of the American state. Exposing its intent is treated as the Original Sin that merits expulsion from the control of the state proxying for God, forcing people to lie to their own conscience to live their lives in a state of numbness of the mind, anesthetized to fear (Isaih Berlin, The Silence in Russian Culture, Ed., Fareed Zakaria; David Remnick, Lenin’s Tomb).

Many study the laws of the land, for a profession, to do justice. A few make the laws of the land to wield power. It is disgraceful that counter terrorism, through a cosmetically committed president for global peace, has become a part of the multilateral strategy at the United Nations, when the best counter terrorism, besides the elements in the UN strategy targeting specific militant groups around the world, is a blend of counter-insurgency (COIN) to isolate the core, incorrigible terrorist elements from among the various terrorist groups to the extent feasible while at the same time being committed to global integration through sustainable global development. A scalpel must be wielded, not a sledgehammer imagined as a fine instrument of surgery.

The oxymoron of lawful injustice thus becomes the domain of power until the power of justice wields its influence to restore the balance, locally and globally.

Advertisements

About Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa

http://www.thecommonera.com/Common_Era/Me.html
This entry was posted in Constitutional Law, Education, Energy and Natural Resources, Foreign Policy, Government, Infrastructure, Monetary Policy, National Security and Defense, Politics, Sociology, Theology, Transformations LLC, World and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Law And Politics

  1. I contributed to a Clinton White House requested critical infrastructure protection speech in 2000 at the Greenspan Federal Reserve at the behest of Alan Greenspan through the Federal Reserve’s Staff Director for Management Stephen R. Malphrus and a Deputy Director of the Fed’s Division of Information Technology Marianne Emerson. Because of my contribution, it appears I was set up and put under public observation and surveillance since then.

    I am being forced not to employ myself as a consultant but to be employed by others, to be in the background for putting my skills to use within the existing paradigm of socially acceptable racial and religious attitudes, preferences and biases, politically correctly, and by respecting the de facto social ceilings, whatever the value of my merits and my capacity to realize my fullest potential.

    I am currently a high-value consultant whose work cannot be in the employ of any other corporation because of the potential for abuse of my reputation and presence as an employee within those corporations for corporate benefit through plausible deniability.

    The same argument holds for the government, for example, Ben Bernanke, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and Barack Obama, president of the United States using intelligence agencies to guinea pig me for their self-aggrandizement and of their supporters, a Federal crime, without acknowledging my contributions through direct, explicit hiring in the appropriate position and because I complained about government abuse of power to the media, the Senate, the FBI and the Nobel Committee, while a government employee at the Federal Reserve in 2010.

    This is a suspected worldwide Secret Service/DIA/CIA activity of white/gray/black guinea-pigging by triggering social controls and a gagging environment through government mediation, in violation of Amendments 1 and 4, to prevent my idea and business model from taking hold because the United States government sees it as not being in the national interest, albeit peaceful, except if it is given away to others of high influence and power.

    My unemployment income through 05/2012 is $11,180. I am unemployed because whenever I am seeking to be a consultant, beginning at the Federal Reserve in 2009, I am being forced to resign from W2 employment to force me to remain in the background. The economics of this unemployment income is a wage of about $5.82 per hour, less than the minimum wage in any part of the country, for a work-year equivalent of 1920 to 2080 hours, while subjecting me to government psychological operations (psyops) to “play the game” or “play along” with the guinea pigging so that the government does not have to acknowledge its criminal wrong doing which has destroyed my marriage of more than 18 years and my family.

    After attempting to medically label me paranoid and delusional through the Montgomery Country Circuit Court in Rockville, MD and the United States Secret Service, the Federal Reserve is finally relenting and cooperating, instead of enjoining me to cooperate as it had done when I complained about the institution commandeering my work outside of my job responsibilities to the benefit of its economist staff, political appointees and others in Washington and elsewhere since 2000 without my consent.

    The Federal Reserve is processing my three (3) SF-95 claims for personal injury damages for the period 2000-2010 and the period since, despite me leaving the Fed. The Senate is investigating a veiled death threat that I received from the Fed. The CIA Inspector General is also in receipt of my SF-95 claim because its security guard, Mr. Pistol, lifted a sub-machine gun for no fault of mine when I went there to drop off my business card as a consultant for Agency procurement attention. The Montgomery County Circuit Court in Rockville, MD is willing to take a second look at the unfairness of my divorce court proceedings brought about by chronic Federal Reserve-IMF interference by pressuring my then spouse Dr. Tabatchnaia Tamirisa, a mid-level manager rank economist in the IMF’s Research Department, to control me at home.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s