United States: National Security Posture And Defense Budget

By Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa, (On Twitter) @c_tamirisa

Flattr this

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey was in California speaking, hosted by the Commonwealth Club and the Marines Memorial Association. As reported on Linkedin’s Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) group, he spoke on “Current International Security Challenges and the Future of the U.S.” with George Scalise, President of Semiconductor Industry Association.

Dempsey is urging Silicon Valley to think of the military, in the face of defense cuts, as much as the Department of Defense (DoD) had been. Money is difficult to come by these days for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to promote major innovations such as the internet as the government had done in the past.

We stand at a time in history for the government to seriously begin to rethink the meaning of national defense. Looking to the future, I have outlined below the major items for strategic planning:

First, the dynamics of the external terrain must be continuously understood and mapped in the context of the geopolitical objectives of the United States and the approach the country ought to consistently take to achieve those objectives over time, independent of partisanship. To this end, all of US intelligence operations and analysis, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), must be consolidated and streamlined, as part of government reform, within the DoD.

  • External engagement must be deployed to defuse tensions without sacrificing civil liberties, both at home and abroad. United States should consider deploying its armed forces for the purpose of, not war, but to rebuild civil societies by broadly raising global standards of living sustainably through efficient uses of natural resources and energy worldwide.
  • Regional enforcement mechanisms through the United Nations Peacekeeping Operations must be used to deal with regional situations rather than exacerbate matters by provoking local and regional arms races. For example, United States of America has no military interests in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) after Afghanistan and Arab Spring despite the regional situation in Syria, Iran, Palestine and Israel.
  • The forum for addressing common global threats is the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and it must be reformed to be more representative of the post-Cold War world order. The world faces common threats and the American approach to resolving the threats must be to diminish armed engagement, entirely if feasible, except in response when the United States is directly attacked anywhere in the world.

Second, national defense priorities for America within its own borders but emerging from outside are: money laundering and narcotics, cyberthreats, small arms and nuclear material, chemicals, and germs (example, Ebola and resurgence of infectious diseases).

  • Nuclear materials issues ought to be taken up by the UNSC, the resolutions aiming to primarily deal with the problems through local and regional enforcement mechanisms rather than accentuating the matters by provoking local and regional arms races.

Last, space is an important long term objective for the DoD to orient and incubate the burgeoning near-earth private space sector because it has more important and focused uses such as (a) disposal of radioactive waste from nuclear plants (b) disposal of excess carbon and other waste from clean coal plants such as FutureGen (c) cleaning up satellite debris in orbit (d) climate science and (e) exploration for resources and migration.

The Department of Transportation’s (DoT) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must be merged with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for regulating all commercial air and space traffic as part of FAA’s NextGen, including any research and development support by the public sector of future development of the National Aerospace Plane (NASP) for intercontinental hypersonic (at least 5 times the speed of sound) commercial passenger travel by 2032.

Launching satellites may become obsolete by 2032 because many of the communications objectives can be met by bouncing off radio signals between towers rather than using satellites.

Provided as above our national security posture is transformed, DoD can be appropriated the approximately $600 billion it is seeking for its operations.

Advertisements

About Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa

http://www.thecommonera.com/Common_Era/Me.html
This entry was posted in National Security and Defense, North America and Caribbean, Transformations LLC and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to United States: National Security Posture And Defense Budget

  1. 30m Walter Russell Mead ‏@wrmead
    More truth than reconciliation? Iraq sentences fugitive VP to death. Regional Sunni-Shia war heats up. http://bit.ly/Q7v1hu
    Expand Reply Retweet Favorite

    28m 1776 @1_776
    @wrmead So be it. What is in it for the West? Their life, their world, their faith, their countries.
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    11:59 AM – 9 Sep 12 · Details

  2. 4m Ali Weinberg ‏@AliNBCNews
    On Space Coast, Obama touting the Curiosity Mars rover, criticizes House Republicans for proposing R + D cuts
    Expand Reply Retweet Favorite

    1m 1776 @1_776
    @AliNBCNews They already have $1 billion for now. http://ctamirisa.com/2012/08/03/nasas-one-billion-dollars-for-commercial-space … , http://ctamirisa.com/2012/08/02/united-states-national-security-posture-and-defense-budget
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    1:12 PM – 9 Sep 12 · Details

  3. 16m Patrick Dollard ‏@PatDollard
    If you rely on someone else to do your fighting, then they are the man and you are the bitch.
    Expand Reply Retweet Favorite

    11m 1776 @1_776
    @PatDollard Retract the military from the rest of the world. There are other ways to deal with it.
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    7:57 PM – 15 Sep 12 · Details

  4. 2m Patrick Dollard ‏@PatDollard
    Michelle Obama: Obesity Is ‘Absolutely’ a National Security Threat http://is.gd/OlWJ6s #sot #tcot #p2 #gop #teaparty #lnyhbt #tlot #nra
    Expand Reply Retweet Favorite

    50s 1776 @1_776
    @PatDollard Yes, it is. War is about obesity. Eating other people’s lunch.
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    8:55 PM – 15 Sep 12 · Details

  5. 19h George Little ‏@PentagonPresSec
    #SecDef outlined goals for regional security in Latin Amer – countering narcotrafficking, terrorism, promoting humanitarian relief efforts.
    Expand Reply Retweeted Favorite

    18h 1776 @1_776
    @PentagonPresSec Excellent. Thank you, now keep at it, http://ctamirisa.com/2012/08/02/united-states-national-security-posture-and-defense-budget/

    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    2:41 PM – 6 Oct 12 · Details

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s