Defining Deviancy Down

By Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa, (On Twitter) @c_tamirisa

Flattr this

Let them who gave us the republic do their job. It, the republic, is theirs to keep or to change.
My response to Benjamin Franklin.

(The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde)

The rodeo of economic recovery after the crisis of 2007-2008, 100 years after The Panic of 1907, has occurred because the panic was prematurely treated as a crisis by the political tango in Washington in the run up to the November election of 2008, “[H]illarious” at least to laugh because Americans are tired of being despondent about their past, present and future.

The positive sigmoid function that is the historical process when viewed through the lens of normative value judgments indeed appears to move in periods of rectitude and immorality.

We are living through another such period of dissolution as we had in the past when the former Professor of Government at Harvard and the late senator from Upstate New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, had expounded in 1993, coining the phrase which titles this essay.

The conscience of a previous member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Kevin Warsh from Albany, New York, had very astutely alerted the country to this pathology creeping into the profession of economic policy making in a speech on June 16, 2009 to the Institute of International Bankers in New York, New York, echoing the sentiment of some of us at the Fed during that time.

Tolerance of policy makers to failure of policies, in a lenient self-evaluation of their jobs, constitutes intellectual and professional indiscipline at best and, at worst, abuse of power if not outright corruption. To any onlooker with an ounce of commonsense about feasible and legitimate alternatives, it makes no sense as to why the country has to put up with extended periods of prolonged unemployment, its most accurate government measure made up of the unemployed, under-employed, holdouts, part-timers and dropouts.

As a trained applied economist-consultant, I suppose I am “unqualified” to explain the Freakonomics of John Bates Clark award-winner Steven Levitt’s econometrics which blissfully ignores the intellectualism of Daniel Patrick Moynihan in this period of mass murders at a frequency of 1 per week across the country, committed by educated and trained white men when black and Hispanic unemployment is close to 40% and also nearly perfectly correlated with their poverty or is it the unintended consequence of maintaining social stability by technology instead of policy?

In fact, the story of the soiling of our national conscience begins in 1993. Howard Kurtz, the critic of his profession, journalism, wrote a book many years ago called The Spin Cycle along the lines of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) linguist Noam Chomsky.

In 1997, new to the cacophony of the nation’s capital – from the relative solitude of Hawai’i – despite being able to discern its rhythms, and between jobs – as a man staying home watching CNN while the wife was at work (now former) trying to figure out the Asian Crisis as a young International Monetary Fund (IMF) economist – I watched the twin idiocies of cultural deviance unfold live as Eurasia was falling apart, its miracle denied: Bill Clinton’s lying body language while wagging his finger spinning the news cycle of Chomsky and Kurtz and the accidental death of Princess Diana after being chased around Siene tunnels in Paris by the tabloid news media when about to prospectively make history: a British aristocrat could marry, after divorcing a future king, an elite Egyptian Muslim. Perhaps, Buckingham Palace had feared another break after Henry VIII, this time from Christendom itself, after the Khobar Towers terrorist bombing in 1996 in Saudi Arabia.

The soap opera, from the controversy over Savings and Loan (S&L) in Arkansas while Bill Clinton was governor to Ken Starr, President Clinton, Cigars and Monica Lewinsky’s Vagina Monologues recorded in anxiety on a friend’s telephone answering machine only to [T]rip[p] the president, was but a blockbuster distraction in the political theater of Washington to obfuscate the deviancy of a presidency which was claimed by the promise to “[Put] People First” only to climax in economic crises around the world and a domestic prosperity built on borrowed household spending: wealth has turned out to be an “effect” – of the magic of the political David Copperfield to create the make-believe of the Clinton economic miracle which has ultimately succeeded in vanishing economic liberty from Asia to America – but not a persisting reality: political consent was manufactured to manufacture the unbridled locust of financial innovation, in a convoluted subversion of economic science, at the expense of American agriculture and manufacturing.

America’s tryst with [its] destiny had commenced as frivolously in its execution as the trysts of its president with the young White House intern Monica Lewinsky, furtively using the classified pages of The Washington Post, trying to cover up its policy failures of radical economic globalization looming as a twister to hit home in a few years. The levees were makeshift because the global economic miracle was make-believe, the economic moral hazard and the political moral turpitude going hand in hand.

The new and old elites, the Clinton noveau riche and the royal riche, had heralded a new culture, unprecedented in its brazenly public risque and ribaldry, sporting the social more of fashionable jealousy and intolerance for morality, corrupting the world into neocolonial submission in premeditation because they cannot control it, defining, perhaps forever, deviancy down.

civis Romanus sum, Dorian Gray?


About Chandrashekar (Chandra) Tamirisa
This entry was posted in Sociology, Transformations LLC and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Defining Deviancy Down

  1. 7h 1776 @1_776
    @wsj Chic (New York, Los Angeles, Paris, London, Milan): Cocaine, Corruption and Children (Bilderberg) Want to be included in civilization?
    Expand Reply Delete Favorite

  2. 9m slone ‏@slone
    EPITOMIZES OBAMA LEADERSHIP STYLE: Rahm Emanuel: “We have the votes. FUCK ’em” … #tcot
    View summary Reply Retweet Favorite

    7m 1776 @1_776
    @slone Obama is correct. There are more registered Democrats than Republicans.
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    9:18 PM – 8 Sep 12 · Details

    7m 1776 @1_776
    @slone People vote party line. He has the votes. His job is to get elected.
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite

    1m 1776 @1_776
    @slone Even Ronald Reagan needed Democrats. Mitt Romney is no Ronald Reagan.
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    9:23 PM – 8 Sep 12 · Details

    slone ‏@slone
    Are you optimistic about Romney’s chances? YES 85% || No 15% || 11,590 votes #tcot
    Expand Reply Retweet Favorite

    5m 1776 @1_776
    @slone It does not matter who wins. Voting is a citizenship choice not an obligation. No compulsion to vote.
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    8:56 PM – 8 Sep 12 · Details

    7m Cory Booker ‏@CoryBooker
    We have enough real issues in this campaign. Let’s stop letting political fear mongers & the media manufacture them. @bmaenner68
    Expand Reply Retweet Favorite

    8m slone ‏@slone
    Bob Woodward: “It was increasingly clear that NO ONE was running Washington. That was trouble for everyone, but ESPECIALLY for Obama,” #tcot
    Expand Reply Retweeted Favorite

    2m 1776 @1_776
    @CoryBooker Let them who gave us the republic do their job. It, the republic, is theirs (elected officials) to keep. My response to Franklin
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    9:22 PM – 8 Sep 12 · Details

  3. 1h Paul Ryan ‏@PaulRyanVP
    [Quora] Is America better off now than four years ago?
    View summary Reply Retweet Favorite

    1h 1776 ‏@1_776
    @PaulRyanVP Civil liberties, corruption, economic decline,
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    2:20 PM – 10 Sep 12 · Details

  4. 30m The Washington Post ‏@washingtonpost
    “My advice for people who want to go into government is, first become a billionaire, and then do it.” — Bloomberg
    Expand Reply Retweet Favorited

    22m 1776 ‏@1_776
    Hide conversation Reply Delete Favorite
    6:51 PM – 12 Sep 12 · Details

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s